p8ep7pd7kn4c

Twenty years ago,Lu Apo began a lawsuit, hope to return to being steal of about 11.34 square meters house .But today ,Lu Apo desire failed to achieve ,The doctor kept notes hanging Dutch act had drug r,played for years .Only 15 copies at all levels of court judgment or ruling, etc.
.In twenty years, the body of Lu Apo one day difference a day,louboutin, now lie in bed and cannot take care of themselves ,and grab the house of Tan Mou also already dead .The dispute continued by the next generation of relay ,Lu Apo had lady replaced mother continues to appeal ,appeal .
Joint venture housing dispute households less divided area in May 7, 1986, Lu Apo and Tan et al cooperation and Chen Haiqing and others signed a joint housing agreement ,Lu Apo will be in Guangzhou city Shahe top 46 ,50 ,51 houses to Chen Haiqing ,demolition ,and Chen Hai and others responsible for project construction and demolition and capital investment .
But in September 20th the same year ,Lu Apo and tan with a 8 and 28 other people signed a joint venture private private housing contract ,both sides agreed to build 7 storey building ,[laughter] 'bus heard two Junior Girls dialogue (welcome to,while Chen Haiqing and others to responsible for construction work ,including the construction ,distribution of housing .
New house completed in 1987 ,but the housing problem has been troubling Lu po .According to Lu Apo daughter once says, Lu Apo and Tan Mou that got the house after the discovery of the housing area ,with contract were less 11.
4525 square metres and 49.4781 square metres . my mother and Chen Haiqing, coordination ,202 rooms used as compensation ,my mother and Tan Mou each 11.34 square meters and 51.725 square meters .
Once said ,www.louboutinpascherelegante.com,although Tan Mou in this scheme can have about two square meters area ,but the plan has not been Tan Mou recognition . In 1988, Tan Mou to court ,www.louboutinpaschernoble.com,Chen Haiqing ,Yang Yijia et al .
Request return Lu shares 11.34 square meters house to tan mou . Once said ,the court finally support the impending request ,and the basis of decision is a by Yang Yijia et al and Tan a private contract .
In a Tianhe District court verdict ( day law civil No. seventh words) on the copies ,the reporter saw the contract text , tan ?Allocation of housing 101 ,201 ,202 rooms three sets, for the area beyond ( Tan Mou area of entitlement ) by some 3 to 6 layers of raising households every square meter price to Party B ( Chen Haiqing ,Yang Yijia et al.
) .According to the court, Tan Mou had belonged to Lu Apo 11.34 meters . My mother has raised objections ,said housing allocation area problem should solve Chen Haiqing et al . Had said ,moncler,but the court found Lu Apo and the construction of party in disputes between belongs to another legal relationship ,in the case of do not adjust .
Court clerk took 15 not get smaller housing more than 11 square meters of limited value ,but the right of unprovoked assault ,louboutin pas cher,CNN site on Hongkong public transportation annoying behavior nail lead,who can bear to swallow it ? The Lu Apo family began a long legal road .
In 1998 I presented a retrial request ,but immediately by the Tianhe District people court . Once said ,Chen Haiqing reason is to tan a certificate issued by the agreement for super area by 3-6 floor raising households price calculation,louboutin, this proved to be the original build a supplement to the contract ,should fulfil .
I am not satisfied ,then Chen Haiqing court . Once said ,the court finds that less compensation its mother house area of facts ,and the judgment of Yang Yijia, Lu 4231.54 yuan compensation limit and interest , but we insist to the house ,not the money .
Miss Zeng said ,but in the intermediate people ,the hospital made the final judgment .Ruling stated in 1986 to build housing agreement not to become effective ,the housing distribution is based on the 1986 private private joint venture housing contract ,and Yang Yijia and others not contract phase each other,www.moncleroutletboutique.com, it rejected all claims have ms.
.In August 26,moncler outlet, 2009, Li to procuratorate applying civil protest .February 8, 2010, city people to build housing agreement does not actually perform ,Chen Haiqing forced private private joint venture contract party building ,the effective judgment of the main evidence for ascertaining the facts ,the Guangzhou intermediate people lodge a protest against the request in accordance with the law ,retrial .
But the Guangzhou City Intermediate People made a ruling party ,to apply for a retrial has more than two year period as prescribed by law ,to end the case retrial litigation . Protest and the period of validity? Miss Zeng said ,its application for retrial,louboutin pas cher, but the Guangdong Provincial Higher People court rejected the applicant .
So twenty years, Lu one family with 15 copies of court documents ,but no one can help them to get more than 10 square metres of the house . Actually appears judgments based on inconsistent ,it is puzzling .
A reluctance to disclose the names of the legal experts say .The legal experts point out that ,according to miss Zeng provide information, in this case litigation housing is based on private private joint venture housing demolition contract ,and private private joint venture housing contract parties including 36, wherein a Tan Mou ,the 8 people such as Lu Apo Chen Xianming ,B 28 ,B both sides do not include Chen Haiqing et al .
It is strange, days of civil judgment in determining word number seventh private private joint venture housing contract is a valid contract,louboutin pas cher, to disregard the private private joint venture housing contract contract party is the 4 people such as Chen Haiqing of this situation, and found that the 4 people such as Chen Haiqing good since 202 the real west south room allocated to the third Lu Yan belongs to tort ,significantly ,and at the request of Lu Po leases housing at the same time ,requirement of a 4 people such as Chen Haiqing Tan to pay over an area of 11.
34 square meters from the house . The legal experts said ,this judgment is obviously the trial court confused to build housing agreement and private private joint venture housing contract relationship, so the request did not actually performed to build housing agreement contract relative to perform private private joint venture housing contract rights and obligations ,www.louboutinpascher90eur.com,after the court judgments apparently aware of this, it is contradictory .
Although the name to retrial ,must be a legally effective judgment made within two years after ,but according to the Civil Procedure Law provisions, the people to force the wrong judgment in accordance with the procedure for trial supervision of retrial ,and provides no time limit .
The legal experts also said , civil procedure law except in case of the parties ,louboutin,procuratorate and the retrial subject ,is the maximum guarantee the legitimate rights and interests of the parties .
So the Guangzhou City Intermediate People end Lu Apo daughter of retrial application does not conform to the provisions of . The legal expert thinks , the case was too many loopholes ,why can not always give a reasonable judgment .